COMPARE 2.1 · LIVE TECHNICAL MATCHUP

Aptos VS Ethereum

Technical intelligence comes first. Market context remains a separate reference layer and never changes TBB Network Quality.

Technical History Market

#14

LEFT NETWORK

Aptos

APT · Proof of Stake BFT

TBB NETWORK QUALITY68.90.0% 24h

Finality: 0.9s
Reliability: 99.50%
Evidence: 63%
Throughput: 160 TPS

Open Aptos profile →

VSTECHNICAL FIRST

#19

RIGHT NETWORK

Ethereum

ETH · Proof of Stake

TBB NETWORK QUALITY64.10.0% 24h

Finality: 780.0s
Reliability: 99.98%
Evidence: 63%
Throughput: 18 TPS

Open Ethereum profile →

Technical matrix Trajectory Market context

TECHNICAL

TBB Network / Quality comparison 2.1

Shared methodology, current technical values, 24h score movement, and Evidence Coverage.

MetricAptosAPTEthereumETHTBB Network Quality Score68.9Technical leader64.1TBB Rank#14#1924h TBB Score Move0.000.00Evidence Coverage62.5% · ModerateTechnical leader62.5% · ModerateTechnical leaderSend Time0.90s · proxyTechnical leader780.00s · proxyFinality0.90sTechnical leader780.00sThroughput160.00 TPSTechnical leader18.00 TPSObserved Activity——Reliability99.50%99.98%Technical leaderBlock Cadence Health——Average Fee0.0010 APT0.000600 ETHEfficiency83.0/100Technical leader77.6/100Performance65.4/100Technical leader27.7/100Reliability Score90.2/10099.8/100Technical leaderSecurity86.0/10098.0/100Technical leaderCost57.1/100Technical leader26.1/100Decentralization68.0/10092.0/100Technical leaderAccessibility70.0/100Technical leader58.0/100Useful Work0.0/100Technical leader0.0/100Technical leader

HISTORY OVERLAY

Compare trajectories, not just snapshots

Overlay 2–4 networks across the same technical series and time window. Historical market data stays outside this technical chart.

AptosEthereum

MOBILE COMPARE

Technical comparison cards

TBB Network Quality Score

APT68.9Technical leader

ETH64.1

TBB Rank

APT#14

ETH#19

24h TBB Score Move

APT0.00

ETH0.00

Evidence Coverage

APT62.5% · ModerateTechnical leader

ETH62.5% · ModerateTechnical leader

Send Time

APT0.90s · proxyTechnical leader

ETH780.00s · proxy

Finality

APT0.90sTechnical leader

ETH780.00s

Throughput

APT160.00 TPSTechnical leader

ETH18.00 TPS

Observed Activity

APT—

ETH—

Reliability

APT99.50%

ETH99.98%Technical leader

Block Cadence Health

APT—

ETH—

Average Fee

APT0.0010 APT

ETH0.000600 ETH

Efficiency

APT83.0/100Technical leader

ETH77.6/100

Performance

APT65.4/100Technical leader

ETH27.7/100

Reliability Score

APT90.2/100

ETH99.8/100Technical leader

Security

APT86.0/100

ETH98.0/100Technical leader

Cost

APT57.1/100Technical leader

ETH26.1/100

Decentralization

APT68.0/100

ETH92.0/100Technical leader

Accessibility

APT70.0/100Technical leader

ETH58.0/100

Useful Work

APT0.0/100Technical leader

ETH0.0/100Technical leader

TWO DIFFERENT QUESTIONS

Network quality is not market popularity.

The technical matrix above measures the network. The market section below provides reference context only, and never changes the TBB score.

How TBB scoring works →

MARKET CONTEXT

Market comparison & context

Reference-only financial market data. These fields do not alter the technical comparison or TBB scoring.

MetricAptosEthereumPrice$0.854725$2.69K24h change+1.98%-1.57%Market cap$744.08M$327.83B24h exchange volume$86.17M$11.37BCirculating supply870.82M APT122.08M ETH

SHAREABLE COMPARISON

Keep this exact comparison

Use the canonical 2–4 chain URL below. It works without local storage.

/compare/?chains=aptos,ethereum