COMPARE 2.1 · LIVE TECHNICAL MATCHUP

Cosmos Hub VS Tezos

Technical intelligence comes first. Market context remains a separate reference layer and never changes TBB Network Quality.

Technical History Market

#11

LEFT NETWORK

Cosmos Hub

ATOM · Tendermint BFT Proof of Stake

TBB NETWORK QUALITY70.60.0% 24h

Finality: 7.0s
Reliability: 99.80%
Evidence: 63%
Throughput: 100 TPS

Open Cosmos Hub profile →

VSTECHNICAL FIRST

#12

RIGHT NETWORK

Tezos

XTZ · Liquid Proof of Stake

TBB NETWORK QUALITY70.50.0% 24h

Finality: 30.0s
Reliability: 99.80%
Evidence: 63%
Throughput: 40 TPS

Open Tezos profile →

Technical matrix Trajectory Market context

TECHNICAL

TBB Network / Quality comparison 2.1

Shared methodology, current technical values, 24h score movement, and Evidence Coverage.

MetricCosmos HubATOMTezosXTZTBB Network Quality Score70.6Technical leader70.5TBB Rank#11#1224h TBB Score Move0.000.00Evidence Coverage62.5% · ModerateTechnical leader62.5% · ModerateTechnical leaderSend Time7.00s · proxyTechnical leader30.00s · proxyFinality7.00sTechnical leader30.00sThroughput100.00 TPSTechnical leader40.00 TPSObserved Activity——Reliability99.80%Technical leader99.80%Technical leaderBlock Cadence Health——Average Fee0.0050 ATOM0.000400 XTZEfficiency86.6/10090.4/100Technical leaderPerformance55.2/100Technical leader44.2/100Reliability Score96.2/100Technical leader96.2/100Technical leaderSecurity90.0/100Technical leader90.0/100Technical leaderCost50.3/10052.8/100Technical leaderDecentralization82.0/10084.0/100Technical leaderAccessibility76.0/10084.0/100Technical leaderUseful Work0.0/100Technical leader0.0/100Technical leader

HISTORY OVERLAY

Compare trajectories, not just snapshots

Overlay 2–4 networks across the same technical series and time window. Historical market data stays outside this technical chart.

Cosmos HubTezos

MOBILE COMPARE

Technical comparison cards

TBB Network Quality Score

ATOM70.6Technical leader

XTZ70.5

TBB Rank

ATOM#11

XTZ#12

24h TBB Score Move

ATOM0.00

XTZ0.00

Evidence Coverage

ATOM62.5% · ModerateTechnical leader

XTZ62.5% · ModerateTechnical leader

Send Time

ATOM7.00s · proxyTechnical leader

XTZ30.00s · proxy

Finality

ATOM7.00sTechnical leader

XTZ30.00s

Throughput

ATOM100.00 TPSTechnical leader

XTZ40.00 TPS

Observed Activity

ATOM—

XTZ—

Reliability

ATOM99.80%Technical leader

XTZ99.80%Technical leader

Block Cadence Health

ATOM—

XTZ—

Average Fee

ATOM0.0050 ATOM

XTZ0.000400 XTZ

Efficiency

ATOM86.6/100

XTZ90.4/100Technical leader

Performance

ATOM55.2/100Technical leader

XTZ44.2/100

Reliability Score

ATOM96.2/100Technical leader

XTZ96.2/100Technical leader

Security

ATOM90.0/100Technical leader

XTZ90.0/100Technical leader

Cost

ATOM50.3/100

XTZ52.8/100Technical leader

Decentralization

ATOM82.0/100

XTZ84.0/100Technical leader

Accessibility

ATOM76.0/100

XTZ84.0/100Technical leader

Useful Work

ATOM0.0/100Technical leader

XTZ0.0/100Technical leader

TWO DIFFERENT QUESTIONS

Network quality is not market popularity.

The technical matrix above measures the network. The market section below provides reference context only, and never changes the TBB score.

How TBB scoring works →

MARKET CONTEXT

Market comparison & context

Reference-only financial market data. These fields do not alter the technical comparison or TBB scoring.

MetricCosmos HubTezosPrice$1.84$0.32887124h change+1.91%-1.69%Market cap$979.32M$360.95M24h exchange volume$77.43M$8.49MCirculating supply532.65M ATOM1.10B XTZ

SHAREABLE COMPARISON

Keep this exact comparison

Use the canonical 2–4 chain URL below. It works without local storage.

/compare/?chains=cosmos,tezos