COMPARE 2.1 · LIVE TECHNICAL MATCHUP

Hedera VS Centronium

Technical intelligence comes first. Market context remains a separate reference layer and never changes TBB Network Quality.

Technical History Market

LEFT NETWORK

Hedera

HBAR · Hashgraph ABFT

TBB NETWORK QUALITY80.00.0% 24h

Finality: 3.5s
Reliability: 99.99%
Evidence: 63%
Throughput: 10.00K TPS

Open Hedera profile →

VSTECHNICAL FIRST

RIGHT NETWORK

Centronium

CENTRO · Proof of Useful Work + Validator Attestation

TBB NETWORK QUALITY85.7+0.0% 24h

Finality: 60.0s
Reliability: 99.50%
Evidence: 100%
Throughput: 50 TPS

Open Centronium profile →

Technical matrix Trajectory Market context

TECHNICAL

TBB Network / Quality comparison 2.1

Shared methodology, current technical values, 24h score movement, and Evidence Coverage.

MetricHederaHBARCentroniumCENTROTBB Network Quality Score80.085.7Technical leaderTBB Rank#2#124h TBB Score Move0.00+0.01Evidence Coverage62.5% · Moderate100.0% · HighTechnical leaderSend Time3.50s · proxy2.00sTechnical leaderFinality3.50sTechnical leader60.00sThroughput10.00K TPSTechnical leader50.00 TPSObserved Activity—0.21 TPSTechnical leaderReliability99.99%Technical leader99.50%Block Cadence Health—82.22%Technical leaderAverage Fee$0.00010.0010 CENTROEfficiency94.8/10098.0/100Technical leaderPerformance87.7/100Technical leader43.3/100Reliability Score100.0/100Technical leader90.2/100Security96.0/100Technical leader90.0/100Cost85.7/10099.0/100Technical leaderDecentralization55.0/10078.0/100Technical leaderAccessibility88.0/10098.0/100Technical leaderUseful Work0.0/100100.0/100Technical leader

HISTORY OVERLAY

Compare trajectories, not just snapshots

Overlay 2–4 networks across the same technical series and time window. Historical market data stays outside this technical chart.

HederaCentronium

MOBILE COMPARE

Technical comparison cards

TBB Network Quality Score

HBAR80.0

CENTRO85.7Technical leader

TBB Rank

HBAR#2

CENTRO#1

24h TBB Score Move

HBAR0.00

CENTRO+0.01

Evidence Coverage

HBAR62.5% · Moderate

CENTRO100.0% · HighTechnical leader

Send Time

HBAR3.50s · proxy

CENTRO2.00sTechnical leader

Finality

HBAR3.50sTechnical leader

CENTRO60.00s

Throughput

HBAR10.00K TPSTechnical leader

CENTRO50.00 TPS

Observed Activity

HBAR—

CENTRO0.21 TPSTechnical leader

Reliability

HBAR99.99%Technical leader

CENTRO99.50%

Block Cadence Health

HBAR—

CENTRO82.22%Technical leader

Average Fee

HBAR$0.0001

CENTRO0.0010 CENTRO

Efficiency

HBAR94.8/100

CENTRO98.0/100Technical leader

Performance

HBAR87.7/100Technical leader

CENTRO43.3/100

Reliability Score

HBAR100.0/100Technical leader

CENTRO90.2/100

Security

HBAR96.0/100Technical leader

CENTRO90.0/100

Cost

HBAR85.7/100

CENTRO99.0/100Technical leader

Decentralization

HBAR55.0/100

CENTRO78.0/100Technical leader

Accessibility

HBAR88.0/100

CENTRO98.0/100Technical leader

Useful Work

HBAR0.0/100

CENTRO100.0/100Technical leader

TWO DIFFERENT QUESTIONS

Network quality is not market popularity.

The technical matrix above measures the network. The market section below provides reference context only, and never changes the TBB score.

How TBB scoring works →

MARKET CONTEXT

Market comparison & context

Reference-only financial market data. These fields do not alter the technical comparison or TBB scoring.

MetricHederaCentroniumPrice$0.0943291.00 C24h change-0.03%—Market cap$4.13B—24h exchange volume$127.61M$88.25KCirculating supply43.83B HBAR8.37M CENTRO

SHAREABLE COMPARISON

Keep this exact comparison

Use the canonical 2–4 chain URL below. It works without local storage.

/compare/?chains=hedera,centronium