COMPARE 2.1 · LIVE TECHNICAL MATCHUP

Internet Computer VS Ethereum

Technical intelligence comes first. Market context remains a separate reference layer and never changes TBB Network Quality.

Technical History Market

LEFT NETWORK

Internet Computer

ICP · Chain Key / Threshold Relay

TBB NETWORK QUALITY73.10.0% 24h

Finality: 2.0s
Reliability: 99.50%
Evidence: 63%
Throughput: 5.00K TPS

Open Internet Computer profile →

VSTECHNICAL FIRST

#19

RIGHT NETWORK

Ethereum

ETH · Proof of Stake

TBB NETWORK QUALITY64.10.0% 24h

Finality: 780.0s
Reliability: 99.98%
Evidence: 63%
Throughput: 18 TPS

Open Ethereum profile →

Technical matrix Trajectory Market context

TECHNICAL

TBB Network / Quality comparison 2.1

Shared methodology, current technical values, 24h score movement, and Evidence Coverage.

MetricInternet ComputerICPEthereumETHTBB Network Quality Score73.1Technical leader64.1TBB Rank#7#1924h TBB Score Move0.000.00Evidence Coverage62.5% · ModerateTechnical leader62.5% · ModerateTechnical leaderSend Time2.00s · proxyTechnical leader780.00s · proxyFinality2.00sTechnical leader780.00sThroughput5.00K TPSTechnical leader18.00 TPSObserved Activity——Reliability99.50%99.98%Technical leaderBlock Cadence Health——Average Fee$0.00100.000600 ETHEfficiency72.6/10077.6/100Technical leaderPerformance85.1/100Technical leader27.7/100Reliability Score90.2/10099.8/100Technical leaderSecurity88.0/10098.0/100Technical leaderCost71.4/100Technical leader26.1/100Decentralization65.0/10092.0/100Technical leaderAccessibility48.0/10058.0/100Technical leaderUseful Work30.0/100Technical leader0.0/100

HISTORY OVERLAY

Compare trajectories, not just snapshots

Overlay 2–4 networks across the same technical series and time window. Historical market data stays outside this technical chart.

Internet ComputerEthereum

MOBILE COMPARE

Technical comparison cards

TBB Network Quality Score

ICP73.1Technical leader

ETH64.1

TBB Rank

ICP#7

ETH#19

24h TBB Score Move

ICP0.00

ETH0.00

Evidence Coverage

ICP62.5% · ModerateTechnical leader

ETH62.5% · ModerateTechnical leader

Send Time

ICP2.00s · proxyTechnical leader

ETH780.00s · proxy

Finality

ICP2.00sTechnical leader

ETH780.00s

Throughput

ICP5.00K TPSTechnical leader

ETH18.00 TPS

Observed Activity

ICP—

ETH—

Reliability

ICP99.50%

ETH99.98%Technical leader

Block Cadence Health

ICP—

ETH—

Average Fee

ICP$0.0010

ETH0.000600 ETH

Efficiency

ICP72.6/100

ETH77.6/100Technical leader

Performance

ICP85.1/100Technical leader

ETH27.7/100

Reliability Score

ICP90.2/100

ETH99.8/100Technical leader

Security

ICP88.0/100

ETH98.0/100Technical leader

Cost

ICP71.4/100Technical leader

ETH26.1/100

Decentralization

ICP65.0/100

ETH92.0/100Technical leader

Accessibility

ICP48.0/100

ETH58.0/100Technical leader

Useful Work

ICP30.0/100Technical leader

ETH0.0/100

TWO DIFFERENT QUESTIONS

Network quality is not market popularity.

The technical matrix above measures the network. The market section below provides reference context only, and never changes the TBB score.

How TBB scoring works →

MARKET CONTEXT

Market comparison & context

Reference-only financial market data. These fields do not alter the technical comparison or TBB scoring.

MetricInternet ComputerEthereumPrice$3.21$2.69K24h change-0.73%-0.89%Market cap$1.79B$328.11B24h exchange volume$73.01M$11.77BCirculating supply556.90M ICP122.08M ETH

SHAREABLE COMPARISON

Keep this exact comparison

Use the canonical 2–4 chain URL below. It works without local storage.

/compare/?chains=internet-computer,ethereum