COMPARE 2.1 · LIVE TECHNICAL MATCHUP

Polygon PoS VS Centronium

Technical intelligence comes first. Market context remains a separate reference layer and never changes TBB Network Quality.

Technical History Market

#16

LEFT NETWORK

Polygon PoS

POL · Proof of Stake

TBB NETWORK QUALITY68.60.0% 24h

Finality: 120.0s
Reliability: 99.70%
Evidence: 63%
Throughput: 200 TPS

Open Polygon PoS profile →

VSTECHNICAL FIRST

RIGHT NETWORK

Centronium

CENTRO · Proof of Useful Work + Validator Attestation

TBB NETWORK QUALITY85.7+0.0% 24h

Finality: 60.0s
Reliability: 99.50%
Evidence: 100%
Throughput: 50 TPS

Open Centronium profile →

Technical matrix Trajectory Market context

TECHNICAL

TBB Network / Quality comparison 2.1

Shared methodology, current technical values, 24h score movement, and Evidence Coverage.

MetricPolygon PoSPOLCentroniumCENTROTBB Network Quality Score68.685.7Technical leaderTBB Rank#16#124h TBB Score Move0.00+0.01Evidence Coverage62.5% · Moderate100.0% · HighTechnical leaderSend Time120.00s · proxy2.00sTechnical leaderFinality120.00s60.00sTechnical leaderThroughput200.00 TPSTechnical leader50.00 TPSObserved Activity—0.21 TPSTechnical leaderReliability99.70%Technical leader99.50%Block Cadence Health—82.22%Technical leaderAverage Fee0.0200 POL0.0010 CENTROEfficiency87.0/10098.0/100Technical leaderPerformance49.9/100Technical leader43.3/100Reliability Score94.2/100Technical leader90.2/100Security84.0/10090.0/100Technical leaderCost57.1/10099.0/100Technical leaderDecentralization75.0/10078.0/100Technical leaderAccessibility75.0/10098.0/100Technical leaderUseful Work0.0/100100.0/100Technical leader

HISTORY OVERLAY

Compare trajectories, not just snapshots

Overlay 2–4 networks across the same technical series and time window. Historical market data stays outside this technical chart.

Polygon PoSCentronium

MOBILE COMPARE

Technical comparison cards

TBB Network Quality Score

POL68.6

CENTRO85.7Technical leader

TBB Rank

POL#16

CENTRO#1

24h TBB Score Move

POL0.00

CENTRO+0.01

Evidence Coverage

POL62.5% · Moderate

CENTRO100.0% · HighTechnical leader

Send Time

POL120.00s · proxy

CENTRO2.00sTechnical leader

Finality

POL120.00s

CENTRO60.00sTechnical leader

Throughput

POL200.00 TPSTechnical leader

CENTRO50.00 TPS

Observed Activity

POL—

CENTRO0.21 TPSTechnical leader

Reliability

POL99.70%Technical leader

CENTRO99.50%

Block Cadence Health

POL—

CENTRO82.22%Technical leader

Average Fee

POL0.0200 POL

CENTRO0.0010 CENTRO

Efficiency

POL87.0/100

CENTRO98.0/100Technical leader

Performance

POL49.9/100Technical leader

CENTRO43.3/100

Reliability Score

POL94.2/100Technical leader

CENTRO90.2/100

Security

POL84.0/100

CENTRO90.0/100Technical leader

Cost

POL57.1/100

CENTRO99.0/100Technical leader

Decentralization

POL75.0/100

CENTRO78.0/100Technical leader

Accessibility

POL75.0/100

CENTRO98.0/100Technical leader

Useful Work

POL0.0/100

CENTRO100.0/100Technical leader

TWO DIFFERENT QUESTIONS

Network quality is not market popularity.

The technical matrix above measures the network. The market section below provides reference context only, and never changes the TBB score.

How TBB scoring works →

MARKET CONTEXT

Market comparison & context

Reference-only financial market data. These fields do not alter the technical comparison or TBB scoring.

MetricPolygon PoSCentroniumPrice$0.1187401.00 C24h change+7.31%—Market cap$1.26B—24h exchange volume$137.89M$88.25KCirculating supply10.62B POL8.37M CENTRO

SHAREABLE COMPARISON

Keep this exact comparison

Use the canonical 2–4 chain URL below. It works without local storage.

/compare/?chains=polygon,centronium