COMPARE 2.1 · LIVE TECHNICAL MATCHUP

Algorand VS Centronium

Technical intelligence comes first. Market context remains a separate reference layer and never changes TBB Network Quality.

Technical History Market

LEFT NETWORK

Algorand

ALGO · Pure Proof of Stake

TBB NETWORK QUALITY79.80.0% 24h

Finality: 3.0s
Reliability: 99.90%
Evidence: 63%
Throughput: 10.00K TPS

Open Algorand profile →

VSTECHNICAL FIRST

RIGHT NETWORK

Centronium

CENTRO · Proof of Useful Work + Validator Attestation

TBB NETWORK QUALITY85.7+0.0% 24h

Finality: 60.0s
Reliability: 99.50%
Evidence: 100%
Throughput: 50 TPS

Open Centronium profile →

Technical matrix Trajectory Market context

TECHNICAL

TBB Network / Quality comparison 2.1

Shared methodology, current technical values, 24h score movement, and Evidence Coverage.

MetricAlgorandALGOCentroniumCENTROTBB Network Quality Score79.885.7Technical leaderTBB Rank#3#124h TBB Score Move0.00+0.01Evidence Coverage62.5% · Moderate100.0% · HighTechnical leaderSend Time3.00s · proxy2.00sTechnical leaderFinality3.00sTechnical leader60.00sThroughput10.00K TPSTechnical leader50.00 TPSObserved Activity—0.21 TPSTechnical leaderReliability99.90%Technical leader99.50%Block Cadence Health—82.22%Technical leaderAverage Fee0.0010 ALGO0.0010 CENTROEfficiency93.4/10098.0/100Technical leaderPerformance88.2/100Technical leader43.3/100Reliability Score98.2/100Technical leader90.2/100Security92.0/100Technical leader90.0/100Cost71.4/10099.0/100Technical leaderDecentralization78.0/100Technical leader78.0/100Technical leaderAccessibility88.0/10098.0/100Technical leaderUseful Work0.0/100100.0/100Technical leader

HISTORY OVERLAY

Compare trajectories, not just snapshots

Overlay 2–4 networks across the same technical series and time window. Historical market data stays outside this technical chart.

AlgorandCentronium

MOBILE COMPARE

Technical comparison cards

TBB Network Quality Score

ALGO79.8

CENTRO85.7Technical leader

TBB Rank

ALGO#3

CENTRO#1

24h TBB Score Move

ALGO0.00

CENTRO+0.01

Evidence Coverage

ALGO62.5% · Moderate

CENTRO100.0% · HighTechnical leader

Send Time

ALGO3.00s · proxy

CENTRO2.00sTechnical leader

Finality

ALGO3.00sTechnical leader

CENTRO60.00s

Throughput

ALGO10.00K TPSTechnical leader

CENTRO50.00 TPS

Observed Activity

ALGO—

CENTRO0.21 TPSTechnical leader

Reliability

ALGO99.90%Technical leader

CENTRO99.50%

Block Cadence Health

ALGO—

CENTRO82.22%Technical leader

Average Fee

ALGO0.0010 ALGO

CENTRO0.0010 CENTRO

Efficiency

ALGO93.4/100

CENTRO98.0/100Technical leader

Performance

ALGO88.2/100Technical leader

CENTRO43.3/100

Reliability Score

ALGO98.2/100Technical leader

CENTRO90.2/100

Security

ALGO92.0/100Technical leader

CENTRO90.0/100

Cost

ALGO71.4/100

CENTRO99.0/100Technical leader

Decentralization

ALGO78.0/100Technical leader

CENTRO78.0/100Technical leader

Accessibility

ALGO88.0/100

CENTRO98.0/100Technical leader

Useful Work

ALGO0.0/100

CENTRO100.0/100Technical leader

TWO DIFFERENT QUESTIONS

Network quality is not market popularity.

The technical matrix above measures the network. The market section below provides reference context only, and never changes the TBB score.

How TBB scoring works →

MARKET CONTEXT

Market comparison & context

Reference-only financial market data. These fields do not alter the technical comparison or TBB scoring.

MetricAlgorandCentroniumPrice$0.1177101.00 C24h change-0.46%—Market cap$1.07B—24h exchange volume$65.24M$88.25KCirculating supply9.06B ALGO8.37M CENTRO

SHAREABLE COMPARISON

Keep this exact comparison

Use the canonical 2–4 chain URL below. It works without local storage.

/compare/?chains=algorand,centronium