Compare 2.0 compatible
COMPARE 2.1 · LIVE TECHNICAL MATCHUP

Algorand VS Hedera

Technical intelligence comes first. Market context remains a separate reference layer and never changes TBB Network Quality.

#3
LEFT NETWORK

Algorand

ALGO · Pure Proof of Stake
TBB NETWORK QUALITY79.80.0% 24h
Finality
3.0s
Reliability
99.90%
Evidence
63%
Throughput
10.00K TPS
Open Algorand profile →
VSTECHNICAL FIRST
#2
RIGHT NETWORK

Hedera

HBAR · Hashgraph ABFT
TBB NETWORK QUALITY80.00.0% 24h
Finality
3.5s
Reliability
99.99%
Evidence
63%
Throughput
10.00K TPS
Open Hedera profile →
TECHNICAL

TBB Network / Quality comparison 2.1

Shared methodology, current technical values, 24h score movement, and Evidence Coverage.

MetricAlgorandALGOHederaHBARTBB Network Quality Score79.880.0Technical leaderTBB Rank#3#224h TBB Score Move0.000.00Evidence Coverage62.5% · ModerateTechnical leader62.5% · ModerateTechnical leaderSend Time3.00s · proxyTechnical leader3.50s · proxyFinality3.00sTechnical leader3.50sThroughput10.00K TPSTechnical leader10.00K TPSTechnical leaderObserved Activity——Reliability99.90%99.99%Technical leaderBlock Cadence Health——Average Fee0.0010 ALGO$0.0001Efficiency93.4/10094.8/100Technical leaderPerformance88.2/100Technical leader87.7/100Reliability Score98.2/100100.0/100Technical leaderSecurity92.0/10096.0/100Technical leaderCost71.4/10085.7/100Technical leaderDecentralization78.0/100Technical leader55.0/100Accessibility88.0/100Technical leader88.0/100Technical leaderUseful Work0.0/100Technical leader0.0/100Technical leader
HISTORY OVERLAY

Compare trajectories, not just snapshots

Overlay 2–4 networks across the same technical series and time window. Historical market data stays outside this technical chart.

Loading historical observations…
AlgorandHedera
MOBILE COMPARE

Technical comparison cards

TBB Network Quality Score

ALGO79.8

HBAR80.0Technical leader

TBB Rank

ALGO#3

HBAR#2

24h TBB Score Move

ALGO0.00

HBAR0.00

Evidence Coverage

ALGO62.5% · ModerateTechnical leader

HBAR62.5% · ModerateTechnical leader

Send Time

ALGO3.00s · proxyTechnical leader

HBAR3.50s · proxy

Finality

ALGO3.00sTechnical leader

HBAR3.50s

Throughput

ALGO10.00K TPSTechnical leader

HBAR10.00K TPSTechnical leader

Observed Activity

ALGO—

HBAR—

Reliability

ALGO99.90%

HBAR99.99%Technical leader

Block Cadence Health

ALGO—

HBAR—

Average Fee

ALGO0.0010 ALGO

HBAR$0.0001

Efficiency

ALGO93.4/100

HBAR94.8/100Technical leader

Performance

ALGO88.2/100Technical leader

HBAR87.7/100

Reliability Score

ALGO98.2/100

HBAR100.0/100Technical leader

Security

ALGO92.0/100

HBAR96.0/100Technical leader

Cost

ALGO71.4/100

HBAR85.7/100Technical leader

Decentralization

ALGO78.0/100Technical leader

HBAR55.0/100

Accessibility

ALGO88.0/100Technical leader

HBAR88.0/100Technical leader

Useful Work

ALGO0.0/100Technical leader

HBAR0.0/100Technical leader

Technical quality versus market context
TWO DIFFERENT QUESTIONS

Network quality is not market popularity.

The technical matrix above measures the network. The market section below provides reference context only, and never changes the TBB score.

How TBB scoring works →
MARKET CONTEXT

Market comparison & context

Reference-only financial market data. These fields do not alter the technical comparison or TBB scoring.

MetricAlgorandHederaPrice$0.117710$0.09432924h change-0.46%-0.03%Market cap$1.07B$4.13B24h exchange volume$65.24M$127.61MCirculating supply9.06B ALGO43.83B HBAR
SHAREABLE COMPARISON

Keep this exact comparison

Use the canonical 2–4 chain URL below. It works without local storage.

/compare/?chains=algorand,hedera