Compare 2.0 compatible
COMPARE 2.1 · LIVE TECHNICAL MATCHUP

Avalanche VS Centronium

Technical intelligence comes first. Market context remains a separate reference layer and never changes TBB Network Quality.

#6
LEFT NETWORK

Avalanche

AVAX · Avalanche Proof of Stake
TBB NETWORK QUALITY74.60.0% 24h
Finality
2.0s
Reliability
99.90%
Evidence
63%
Throughput
4.50K TPS
Open Avalanche profile →
VSTECHNICAL FIRST
#1
RIGHT NETWORK

Centronium

CENTRO · Proof of Useful Work + Validator Attestation
TBB NETWORK QUALITY85.7+0.0% 24h
Finality
60.0s
Reliability
99.50%
Evidence
100%
Throughput
50 TPS
Open Centronium profile →
TECHNICAL

TBB Network / Quality comparison 2.1

Shared methodology, current technical values, 24h score movement, and Evidence Coverage.

MetricAvalancheAVAXCentroniumCENTROTBB Network Quality Score74.685.7Technical leaderTBB Rank#6#124h TBB Score Move0.00+0.01Evidence Coverage62.5% · Moderate100.0% · HighTechnical leaderSend Time2.00s · proxyTechnical leader2.00sTechnical leaderFinality2.00sTechnical leader60.00sThroughput4.50K TPSTechnical leader50.00 TPSObserved Activity—0.21 TPSTechnical leaderReliability99.90%Technical leader99.50%Block Cadence Health—82.22%Technical leaderAverage Fee0.0020 AVAX0.0010 CENTROEfficiency85.2/10098.0/100Technical leaderPerformance84.4/100Technical leader43.3/100Reliability Score98.2/100Technical leader90.2/100Security91.0/100Technical leader90.0/100Cost47.2/10099.0/100Technical leaderDecentralization82.0/100Technical leader78.0/100Accessibility72.0/10098.0/100Technical leaderUseful Work0.0/100100.0/100Technical leader
HISTORY OVERLAY

Compare trajectories, not just snapshots

Overlay 2–4 networks across the same technical series and time window. Historical market data stays outside this technical chart.

Loading historical observations…
AvalancheCentronium
MOBILE COMPARE

Technical comparison cards

TBB Network Quality Score

AVAX74.6

CENTRO85.7Technical leader

TBB Rank

AVAX#6

CENTRO#1

24h TBB Score Move

AVAX0.00

CENTRO+0.01

Evidence Coverage

AVAX62.5% · Moderate

CENTRO100.0% · HighTechnical leader

Send Time

AVAX2.00s · proxyTechnical leader

CENTRO2.00sTechnical leader

Finality

AVAX2.00sTechnical leader

CENTRO60.00s

Throughput

AVAX4.50K TPSTechnical leader

CENTRO50.00 TPS

Observed Activity

AVAX—

CENTRO0.21 TPSTechnical leader

Reliability

AVAX99.90%Technical leader

CENTRO99.50%

Block Cadence Health

AVAX—

CENTRO82.22%Technical leader

Average Fee

AVAX0.0020 AVAX

CENTRO0.0010 CENTRO

Efficiency

AVAX85.2/100

CENTRO98.0/100Technical leader

Performance

AVAX84.4/100Technical leader

CENTRO43.3/100

Reliability Score

AVAX98.2/100Technical leader

CENTRO90.2/100

Security

AVAX91.0/100Technical leader

CENTRO90.0/100

Cost

AVAX47.2/100

CENTRO99.0/100Technical leader

Decentralization

AVAX82.0/100Technical leader

CENTRO78.0/100

Accessibility

AVAX72.0/100

CENTRO98.0/100Technical leader

Useful Work

AVAX0.0/100

CENTRO100.0/100Technical leader

Technical quality versus market context
TWO DIFFERENT QUESTIONS

Network quality is not market popularity.

The technical matrix above measures the network. The market section below provides reference context only, and never changes the TBB score.

How TBB scoring works →
MARKET CONTEXT

Market comparison & context

Reference-only financial market data. These fields do not alter the technical comparison or TBB scoring.

MetricAvalancheCentroniumPrice$10.791.00 C24h change+2.78%—Market cap$4.77B—24h exchange volume$599.53M$88.25KCirculating supply443.07M AVAX8.37M CENTRO
SHAREABLE COMPARISON

Keep this exact comparison

Use the canonical 2–4 chain URL below. It works without local storage.

/compare/?chains=avalanche,centronium