Compare 2.0 compatible
COMPARE 2.1 · LIVE TECHNICAL MATCHUP

Hedera VS Algorand

Technical intelligence comes first. Market context remains a separate reference layer and never changes TBB Network Quality.

#2
LEFT NETWORK

Hedera

HBAR · Hashgraph ABFT
TBB NETWORK QUALITY80.00.0% 24h
Finality
3.5s
Reliability
99.99%
Evidence
63%
Throughput
10.00K TPS
Open Hedera profile →
VSTECHNICAL FIRST
#3
RIGHT NETWORK

Algorand

ALGO · Pure Proof of Stake
TBB NETWORK QUALITY79.80.0% 24h
Finality
3.0s
Reliability
99.90%
Evidence
63%
Throughput
10.00K TPS
Open Algorand profile →
TECHNICAL

TBB Network / Quality comparison 2.1

Shared methodology, current technical values, 24h score movement, and Evidence Coverage.

MetricHederaHBARAlgorandALGOTBB Network Quality Score80.0Technical leader79.8TBB Rank#2#324h TBB Score Move0.000.00Evidence Coverage62.5% · ModerateTechnical leader62.5% · ModerateTechnical leaderSend Time3.50s · proxy3.00s · proxyTechnical leaderFinality3.50s3.00sTechnical leaderThroughput10.00K TPSTechnical leader10.00K TPSTechnical leaderObserved Activity——Reliability99.99%Technical leader99.90%Block Cadence Health——Average Fee$0.00010.0010 ALGOEfficiency94.8/100Technical leader93.4/100Performance87.7/10088.2/100Technical leaderReliability Score100.0/100Technical leader98.2/100Security96.0/100Technical leader92.0/100Cost85.7/100Technical leader71.4/100Decentralization55.0/10078.0/100Technical leaderAccessibility88.0/100Technical leader88.0/100Technical leaderUseful Work0.0/100Technical leader0.0/100Technical leader
HISTORY OVERLAY

Compare trajectories, not just snapshots

Overlay 2–4 networks across the same technical series and time window. Historical market data stays outside this technical chart.

Loading historical observations…
HederaAlgorand
MOBILE COMPARE

Technical comparison cards

TBB Network Quality Score

HBAR80.0Technical leader

ALGO79.8

TBB Rank

HBAR#2

ALGO#3

24h TBB Score Move

HBAR0.00

ALGO0.00

Evidence Coverage

HBAR62.5% · ModerateTechnical leader

ALGO62.5% · ModerateTechnical leader

Send Time

HBAR3.50s · proxy

ALGO3.00s · proxyTechnical leader

Finality

HBAR3.50s

ALGO3.00sTechnical leader

Throughput

HBAR10.00K TPSTechnical leader

ALGO10.00K TPSTechnical leader

Observed Activity

HBAR—

ALGO—

Reliability

HBAR99.99%Technical leader

ALGO99.90%

Block Cadence Health

HBAR—

ALGO—

Average Fee

HBAR$0.0001

ALGO0.0010 ALGO

Efficiency

HBAR94.8/100Technical leader

ALGO93.4/100

Performance

HBAR87.7/100

ALGO88.2/100Technical leader

Reliability Score

HBAR100.0/100Technical leader

ALGO98.2/100

Security

HBAR96.0/100Technical leader

ALGO92.0/100

Cost

HBAR85.7/100Technical leader

ALGO71.4/100

Decentralization

HBAR55.0/100

ALGO78.0/100Technical leader

Accessibility

HBAR88.0/100Technical leader

ALGO88.0/100Technical leader

Useful Work

HBAR0.0/100Technical leader

ALGO0.0/100Technical leader

Technical quality versus market context
TWO DIFFERENT QUESTIONS

Network quality is not market popularity.

The technical matrix above measures the network. The market section below provides reference context only, and never changes the TBB score.

How TBB scoring works →
MARKET CONTEXT

Market comparison & context

Reference-only financial market data. These fields do not alter the technical comparison or TBB scoring.

MetricHederaAlgorandPrice$0.094329$0.11771024h change-0.03%-0.46%Market cap$4.13B$1.07B24h exchange volume$127.61M$65.24MCirculating supply43.83B HBAR9.06B ALGO
SHAREABLE COMPARISON

Keep this exact comparison

Use the canonical 2–4 chain URL below. It works without local storage.

/compare/?chains=hedera,algorand