Compare 2.0 compatible
COMPARE 2.1 · LIVE TECHNICAL MATCHUP

Sui VS Centronium

Technical intelligence comes first. Market context remains a separate reference layer and never changes TBB Network Quality.

#9
LEFT NETWORK

Sui

SUI · Delegated Proof of Stake
TBB NETWORK QUALITY71.00.0% 24h
Finality
0.5s
Reliability
99.50%
Evidence
63%
Throughput
850 TPS
Open Sui profile →
VSTECHNICAL FIRST
#1
RIGHT NETWORK

Centronium

CENTRO · Proof of Useful Work + Validator Attestation
TBB NETWORK QUALITY85.7+0.0% 24h
Finality
60.0s
Reliability
99.50%
Evidence
100%
Throughput
50 TPS
Open Centronium profile →
TECHNICAL

TBB Network / Quality comparison 2.1

Shared methodology, current technical values, 24h score movement, and Evidence Coverage.

MetricSuiSUICentroniumCENTROTBB Network Quality Score71.085.7Technical leaderTBB Rank#9#124h TBB Score Move0.00+0.01Evidence Coverage62.5% · Moderate100.0% · HighTechnical leaderSend Time0.50s · proxyTechnical leader2.00sFinality0.50sTechnical leader60.00sThroughput850.00 TPSTechnical leader50.00 TPSObserved Activity—0.21 TPSTechnical leaderReliability99.50%Technical leader99.50%Technical leaderBlock Cadence Health—82.22%Technical leaderAverage Fee0.0020 SUI0.0010 CENTROEfficiency83.0/10098.0/100Technical leaderPerformance78.4/100Technical leader43.3/100Reliability Score90.2/100Technical leader90.2/100Technical leaderSecurity86.0/10090.0/100Technical leaderCost57.1/10099.0/100Technical leaderDecentralization70.0/10078.0/100Technical leaderAccessibility70.0/10098.0/100Technical leaderUseful Work0.0/100100.0/100Technical leader
HISTORY OVERLAY

Compare trajectories, not just snapshots

Overlay 2–4 networks across the same technical series and time window. Historical market data stays outside this technical chart.

Loading historical observations…
SuiCentronium
MOBILE COMPARE

Technical comparison cards

TBB Network Quality Score

SUI71.0

CENTRO85.7Technical leader

TBB Rank

SUI#9

CENTRO#1

24h TBB Score Move

SUI0.00

CENTRO+0.01

Evidence Coverage

SUI62.5% · Moderate

CENTRO100.0% · HighTechnical leader

Send Time

SUI0.50s · proxyTechnical leader

CENTRO2.00s

Finality

SUI0.50sTechnical leader

CENTRO60.00s

Throughput

SUI850.00 TPSTechnical leader

CENTRO50.00 TPS

Observed Activity

SUI—

CENTRO0.21 TPSTechnical leader

Reliability

SUI99.50%Technical leader

CENTRO99.50%Technical leader

Block Cadence Health

SUI—

CENTRO82.22%Technical leader

Average Fee

SUI0.0020 SUI

CENTRO0.0010 CENTRO

Efficiency

SUI83.0/100

CENTRO98.0/100Technical leader

Performance

SUI78.4/100Technical leader

CENTRO43.3/100

Reliability Score

SUI90.2/100Technical leader

CENTRO90.2/100Technical leader

Security

SUI86.0/100

CENTRO90.0/100Technical leader

Cost

SUI57.1/100

CENTRO99.0/100Technical leader

Decentralization

SUI70.0/100

CENTRO78.0/100Technical leader

Accessibility

SUI70.0/100

CENTRO98.0/100Technical leader

Useful Work

SUI0.0/100

CENTRO100.0/100Technical leader

Technical quality versus market context
TWO DIFFERENT QUESTIONS

Network quality is not market popularity.

The technical matrix above measures the network. The market section below provides reference context only, and never changes the TBB score.

How TBB scoring works →
MARKET CONTEXT

Market comparison & context

Reference-only financial market data. These fields do not alter the technical comparison or TBB scoring.

MetricSuiCentroniumPrice$1.191.00 C24h change+9.56%—Market cap$4.85B—24h exchange volume$1.70B$88.25KCirculating supply4.10B SUI8.37M CENTRO
SHAREABLE COMPARISON

Keep this exact comparison

Use the canonical 2–4 chain URL below. It works without local storage.

/compare/?chains=sui,centronium